Plotting a path through the trees – constraint or opportunity?

Plotting a path through the trees – constraint or opportunity?

  • 16 Aug 2016

What is the best way to navigate trees on a development? Tom Luck, sustainability consultant at Eight Associates, discusses…

Trees can be assets; they are widely understood to contribute to people’s wellbeing, enhance a development’s desirability and value, reduce noise and the visual impact of traffic; even their shade can help reduce energy costs.

Local and central government have long taken steps to protect the tree stock, but often a development site is acquired and an outline design undertaken, before tree advice has been sought.

Considering trees

The early valuation of tree quality can enable a project design to be flexible enough to incorporate high quality trees – and the ability to integrate trees into close proximity of the project has been shown to increase floor area by more than 10%. However, proposed developments that show the removal of trees that the local authority considers valuable, often falter at planning application stage or require rushed amends to the design at the cost of building design and floor area.

A tree preservation order search should be conducted before acquiring the site. It is an offence to cut down, wilfully damage or destroy a tree protected by that order without the authority’s permission. Owners remain responsible for trees covered by tree preservation orders, with fines of up to £20,000 for damages to protected trees.

The first project design often assumes that the removal of trees is necessary to allow for construction facilitation, such as access, installing utilities or car parks. A tree survey, conducted by an arboricultural consultant, must be submitted where there are trees within, or adjacent to, a proposed planning application site, which could be affected by the development.

A tree survey is required to inform the impact assessment, which is used by the local authority to draw conclusions about planning permission. Arboricultural advice at this stage could enhance the design by showing how light construction techniques are possible within the Root Protection Area (RPA) of trees.

Plotting a path through the trees – constraint or opportunity?

Protecting trees on site

Trees have three fundamental requirements – light, water and aerated soil. Tree roots are generally found in the top 800mm of soil and extend via the path of least resistance radially from the stem.

The BS 5837:2012 Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction – Recommendations, provides a calculation for establishing the area around a tree in which roots are likely to be found. The RPA can be calculated by multiplying the stem diameter by 12, at 150mm from ground level, to provide a radius from the stem.

Two regular causes of damage to trees include soil compaction and root severance. Soil compaction can be caused by vehicular or pedestrian traffic through the RPA, squeezing the oxygen held in the pores of the soil. Root severance occurs during excavation works within the RPA.

There are technical solutions to construction within the RPA of existing trees: One option is Cellular Confinement Systems (CCS). CCS is a versatile hard plastic mesh, which can be overlaid on soils to spread the load laterally and drastically reduce soil compaction created by pedestrian and vehicular traffic. This is a nodig solution, as the CCS mesh is laid over the existing soil and filled with a clean, granular sub-base to allow for soil aeration.

This is levelled and compacted, topped with a further layer of geotextile and a sub-base, and a permeable surface added, such as porous asphalt, porous block paving, and gravels. This system is appropriate for driveways and car parking solutions in and around existing trees on site.

Traditional strip footings can result in substantial root loss. Using the smallest practical pile diameter when installing piling near trees reduces the possibility of striking substantial tree roots – and reduces the size of the rig required to sink the piles. In some cases, it is possible to insert specially engineered structures within the RPAs.

The viability is assessed through an exploratory investigation involving the careful excavation within the RPA to create a number of concrete columns to support a cantilevered slab.

A ventilated air space between the underside of the slab and the existing soil is needed to enable gaseous exchange through the soil and a specialist irrigation system is required. These and CCS solutions must adhere to BS 5837:2012, advice from a suitable engineer, specialist arboriculturalist and the local authorities’ requirements.

Is it worth the effort?

Yes, in nearly every case. For example, if boundary trees that have been identified as good quality and a prominent landscape feature are on site it is possible, with some relatively minor rearrangements, to extend into the RPAs for the driveway and parking.

The consideration of trees on development sites is often seen as a hurdle. Working with an arboricultural consultant as early as possible in the project means the expert consideration of existing trees on site could lead to a smoother journey through the planning process, and a viable design with a maximised footprint.

Leave a Reply

Latest news

BMBI
GEZE
Encon
SWA

SWA: A focus on Steel Window Association member West Leigh

Located in Charlton, South London, SWA member West Leigh was established during the Blitz, in 1943. During the destruction in London, the company helped in repairing windows and facades that had been damaged by bombings throughout the city.

Posted in Articles, Building Associations & Institutes, Building Industry News, Building Products & Structures, Building Services, Building Systems, Case Studies, Facades, Glass, Glazing, Restoration & Refurbishment, Retrofit & Renovation, Steel and Structural Frames, Walls, Windows